Samples and mock-ups for construction
Samples and mock-ups have become more common requirements on construction projects as the number and complexity of goods and materials that are available and that are required for a single project has increased.
Samples might include simple items such as paint, tiles, bricks, or carpets. Mock-ups are scaled-down or full-size assemblies, such as sections of cladding, window assemblies or masonry.
There are a number of reasons that samples and mock-ups may be required:
- They may be required as part of the tender process when alternative suppliers or products are being considered before an order is placed.
- They may be required after selection to demonstrate compliance with the specification, to allow review of appearance or for testing to be carried out.
- Some suppliers may prepare them themselves to verify their ability to produce a product to the required specification.
The benefits of requiring samples or mock-ups include:
- Lessons can be learned from failures discovered through the tests that are performed.
- Potential issues and causes of failures can be taken into consideration and mitigated against.
- The process of testing and approval can improve the durability and longevity of the finished building.
- They can help test the way installed materials interact.
- They can help improved energy efficiency.
- They provide assurance that the specified materials will function as required under a variety of conditions.
- They can help understand the boundaries between trades.
- They can help improve installation techniques prior to actual work beginning.
- They can be useful obtaining approval from stakeholders who may find it difficult to understand drawings and specifications.
Mock-ups can be built and tested either on site, as part of the building itself, at the manufacturer’s premises, or in a third-party testing facility such as a laboratory.
The benefits of the manufacturer’s premises or a testing facility are that the controlled indoor environment can allow for quicker testing, and alterations to the product and the testing procedure can be made relatively easily. Laboratory conditions are also more likely to produce more reliable test results. However, this may involve the project team and the client travelling to the facility, and there may be time limitations, travel considerations, and additional costs involved.
The benefits of site-built mock-ups are that the installation can take place under the actual conditions that the actual structure will be exposed to, there are no additional travel or hire fees, and there are likely to be fewer time constraints. Potential drawbacks include difficulties in the construction and testing schedule because of inclement weather, site conditions, site availability, and so on.
If mock-ups are required, the project documents and specifications should include the precise requirements and test procedures. Test procedures should cover the specific tests, how they will be carried out, the conditions under which the test should be carried out, the qualifications for pass or failure and any requirement for witnesses to attend, such as designers or the client. This allows for the cost of the mock-up to be included as part of the original bid.
Once the supply contract has been let, comments on samples and mock-ups can only be made in relation to what is allowed by the contract. Comments that amount to a change in requirements would have to be consented to by the supplier and may result in an adjustment to the contract sum and a claim for extension of time.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Buildability in construction.
- Computer-generated imagery (CGI).
- Construction progress meeting.
- Construction site inspection.
- Contingency plan.
- Design review.
- Layer.
- Model-based design.
- Modular building.
- Offsite manufacturing.
- Pre-construction information.
- Prefabrication.
- Quality control.
- Submittals.
- Tolerances.
Featured articles and news
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.