Project benchmarking
See also: Benchmarking as business tool.
Benchmarking is a process by which the estimated performance (often cost) of a project is compared to other similar projects. This can highlight areas of design that are not offering good value for money and can help in the assessment of tenders from suppliers and contractors.
Benchmarking is increasingly being carried out on public projects, where the government has access to large amounts of cost data for similar projects. For example, when analysis of the recent schools programme was carried out, it was found that it '... exposed variations in costs that could not be justified by project differences' (ref. Cabinet Office: Government Construction Strategy, May 2011).
It is now proposed that cost benchmarking should be carried out across all government capital programmes to create baselines for a cost/value-led approach to procurement.
In the private sector, comparable cost information may not be so readily available. However, large organisations may have access to in-house cost information, and some cost information is published. Comparative information can also be purchased from sources such as the Building Cost Information Service (BCIS). See BCIS Online for a description of the tender price and duration information available.
It is important, however, that benchmarking does not simply consider construction costs, as these are only a small proportion of whole-life costs, and setting a low benchmark for construction could result in higher operating, maintenance and refurbishment costs throughout the life of the building.
There is now an increasing amount of data available about energy use, sustainability and whole-life costs such as:
- CarbonBuzz, an on-line service that allows architects and engineers to share project forecasts and energy use anonymously.
- Bench iT, a service for quantity surveyors to benchmark KPI's
- The Carbon Trust Energy Benchmarking
- The Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers.
- Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM).
- Closing the Loop – Benchmarks for Sustainable Buildings (RIBA).
It is important also to consider both quality and time, as the lowest cost option may not always offer the best value for the client or deliver a completed project within the required timeframe.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Bench iT
- Benchmark.
- Benchmarking as business tool.
- Best practice.
- Business case.
- Cross estimating method.
- Design review.
- Design quality.
- Earned value analysis.
- Estimate.
- Health performance indicators in the built environment.
- Key performance indicators.
- Pareto analysis.
- Project performance management.
- Public sector comparator.
[edit] External references
- Government construction strategy, Page 11.
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
Comments
To start a discussion about this article, click 'Add a comment' above and add your thoughts to this discussion page.