Quantified demand for dilapidations
Dilapidations are breaches of leases due to the condition of the property being leased. This may result from mistreatment of the property or poor or absent maintenance or repairs that are required by the lease. Further work may also be required at the end of a lease to reinstate alterations that have been made to the property by the tenant.
If the required works are not carried out, the landlord may issue a schedule of dilapidations, or a notice to reinstate. If dilapidations works are not carried out by the end of the lease, the landlord may claim damages from the tenant (a terminal dilapidations claim). This may take the form of a ‘quantified demand’ prepared by the landlord or their surveyor setting out details of the landlord’s losses as a result of the dilapidations.
The quantified demand might include:
- The cost of the repair works.
- The loss of value to the property.
- Holding costs.
- Loss of rent and service charge.
- Rates.
- Insurance.
- Security.
- Utilities.
- Cleaning.
- Finance costs.
- Fees.
- Consequential losses such as professional fees, legal fees, the cost of administration of the repair work and VAT. The legal basis for consequential losses should be set out.
However, the landlord cannot profit from this claim, so if for example they do not intent to reinstate the property (perhaps if the property is to be demolished or refurbished), this must be taken into account.
There may be a period of negotiation between the tenant and landlord in an attempt to agree a settlement figure. If the negotiation process fails then alternative dispute resolution or court proceedings may be necessary.
Valuation of the landlord’s losses can be complex, and so both parties may wish to appoint a surveyors to offer advice and prepare appropriate documentation. Further specialist advice may be necessary for complex components or aspects of the property, such as building services plant. Court proceedings may also involve expert witnesses.
A ‘Pre-Action Protocol for Claims for Damages in Relation to the Physical State of Commercial Property at Termination of a Tenancy’ (the Dilapidations Protocol) is available from the Ministry of Justice. This describes the conduct the court expects the parties to follow before commencing proceedings, setting out a process and timetable for the exchange of information, and establishing standards for the content and quality of schedules of dilapidations and quantified demands.
The protocol suggests that the quantified demand should:
- Set out clearly all aspects of the dispute, and set out and substantiate the monetary sum sought as damages in respect of the breaches detailed in the schedule as well as any other items of loss for which damages are sought.
- Set out whether VAT applies.
- Specify a date (being a reasonable time) by which the tenant should respond. This will usually be within 56 days after sending the quantified demand.
- Where the monetary sum sought is based on the cost of works, it should be fully quantified and substantiated by either an invoice or a detailed estimate.
- If the quantified demand includes any other losses, they must be set out in detail, substantiated and fully quantified. The landlord should explain the legal basis for the recovery of losses, e.g. whether they are sought as part of the damages claim or under some express or implied provision of the lease.
The quantified demand will generally be separate from the schedule of dilapidations but may be bound into the same document.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Alternative dispute resolution.
- Betterment.
- Break clauses in leases.
- Dilapidations.
- Dilapidations protocol.
- Lease Negotiations - Tenants Checklist.
- Licence for Alterations for Apartment.
- Rent-free period.
- Rent in administration.
- Rent review.
- Sample retail lease.
- Schedule of dilapidations.
- Scott schedule.
- Supersession.
[edit] External references
- RICS, A clear, impartial guide to Dilapidations For use in England and Wales. November 2013.
- Ministry of Justice, Pre-Action Protocol for Claims for Damages in Relation to the Physical State of Commercial Property at Termination of a Tenancy.
- Ministry of Justice, Pre-Action Protocol for Housing Disrepair.
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.