Joint names policy
Contents[hide] |
[edit] Overview
A joint names policy is type of insurance often required by construction contracts. The policy is typically held jointly by the employer and the contractor, although other parties such as funders may also wish to be included. The key feature of this type of policy is that the insured parties are unable to claim against one another in respect of an insured loss, as they are considered to be one-and-the-same for the purposes of the insurance.
This has a number of advantages. Firstly, it means that neither party needs to take out its own insurance policy, which can lead to dual insurance, unnecessarily increasing the project’s total insurance cost. Secondly, it can help avoid costly litigation between the jointly-insured parties who may otherwise try to claim against the other. In addition, the policy cannot be cancelled without both the parties being aware of this.
The insurer has no rights of subrogation, meaning that they cannot recover amounts paid to one of the insured by pursuing the other.
Joint names contractor’s all-risks insurance is particularly common, (sometimes referred to as 'contract works insurance') and covers all risks normally associated with a construction project.
Joint names policies are also common on building contracts involving renovations and extensions, where it is normally taken out by the property owner/employer and building contractor. Typically this covers both the existing structure and the works themselves, and means the property owner/employer is entitled to the proceeds of a claim made under the cover, which they would not be entitled to if the works cover were in the contractor’s name alone. This helps protect them against the potential insolvency of the contractor, or problems claiming disputed amounts.
[edit] Tyco v Rolls Royce
In the case of Tyco v Rolls Royce, a fire protection scheme, designed and installed by the claimant, leaked and damaged parts of the building that were separate from the works. Before beginning the work, the claimant had agreed to indemnify the defendant against damage that may result from their negligence, and the defendant was required to maintain joint names insurance in respect of ‘specified perils’.
The defendant claimed damages to which the claimant argued it could not be held liable, as the contract had required a joint names policy which the defendant had failed to take out. They argued that had the defendant taken out the policy, they would have been able to claim damages from the insurer.
The court initially ruled that the claimant could not be liable because the defendant had failed to take out the appropriate insurance as specified by the contractual scheme adopted by both parties.
However, the Court of Appeal overturned this ruling, finding that the contract only referred to a joint names policy with ‘others’, including ‘contractors’ and that this did not specifically identify Tyco. In any event, joint names insurance would not necessarily have prevented a subrogated action against the contractor. This would only have been prevented by express terms in the policy prohibiting it.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki:
- Contract works insurance.
- Design liability.
- Directors and officers insurance.
- Excepted risk.
- Flood insurance.
- Insurance.
- JCT Clause 6.5.1 Insurance.
- Latent defects insurance.
- Legal indemnities.
- Professional Indemnity Insurance.
- Specified perils in construction contracts.
- Sub-contract.
[edit] External references
- JCT Insurance - Joint names insurance
- Mondaq - Joint names insurance and risk allocation in construction projects
Featured articles and news
The increasing costs of repair and remediation
Highlighted by regulator of social housing, as acceleration plan continues.
Free topic guide on mould in buildings
The new TG 26/2024 published by BSRIA.
Greater control for LAs over private rental selective licensing
A brief explanation of changes with the NRLA response.
Practice costs for architectural technologists
Salary standards and working out what you’re worth.
The Health and Safety Executive at 50
And over 200 years of Operational Safety and Health.
Thermal imaging surveys a brief intro
Thermal Imaging of Buildings; a pocket guide BG 72/2017.
Internally insulating a historical building
An experimental DIY approach using mineral thermal lime plaster.
Tree species selection for green infrastructure: A guide for specifiers.
50 million new trees over 25 years.
Art of Building CIOB photographic competition public vote
The last week to vote for a winner until 10 January 2025.
The future of the Grenfell Tower site
Principles, promises, recommendations and a decision expected in February 2025.
20 years of the Chartered Environmentalist
If not now, when?
Journeys in Industrious England
Thomas Baskerville’s expeditions in the 1600s.
Top 25 Building Safety Wiki articles of 2024
Take a look what most people have been reading about.
Life and death at Highgate Cemetery
Balancing burials and tourism.
The 25 most read articles on DB for 2024
Design portion to procurement route and all between.
The act of preservation may sometimes be futile.
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.