Latent defects insurance
It is the nature of construction projects that faults and defects caused by failures in design, workmanship or materials, may not become apparent or readily detectable (even with the exercise of reasonable care) until many years after completion of the project, long after the end of the defects liability period. Such defects are known as latent defects. Latent defects can be extremely expensive and disruptive to rectify.
Latent defects insurance provides cover for new buildings (or new works to existing buildings) in the event that latent defects become apparent. Latent defects insurance is seen to provide more complete cover for defects than other methods, (such as collateral warranties) which may require proof of breach of contract. This can take considerable time, and can be subject to complications such as net contribution clauses and insolvencies.
Latent defects insurance was proposed in 1988 when the Construction Industry Sector Group of the National Economic Development Council published their report Building Users' Insurance Against Latent Defects. At the time, there was little take up, as the premium, was in the order of 1.3% to 1.7% of the rebuilding cost. So, for example, on a £10 million rebuilding cost, the premium would be of the order of £150,000. In addition, there were fees and expenses for independent design checkers.
However, there is now much more flexibility in the insurance market as to the range of available cover available. There are several insurers writing building defects type insurance and premiums are reducing. As a consequence, latent defects insurance is becoming more prevalent.
Cover will usually be provided for 8 to 12 years from the issue of the final certificate or certificate of practical completion (although longer policies are now available). Typically, the insurance provides cover, up to the full rebuild cost, for repairs and for work to prevent imminent damage.
Basic policies cover the structure and weatherproofing but this can be extended to include non-structural elements and mechanical and electrical services (such as heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, water systems, lifts, escalators, electrical distribution systems, building management systems, and so on), and some policies will provide cover for loss of rent, loss of profit or revenue, and the costs of working from alternative premises.
Premiums can either be payable annually, or through a single, one-off payment, and policies are generally freely assignable.
In addition to the premium, technical auditors will have to be paid for by the insured to check the design for insurers. There is, inevitably, an element of duplication of fees here in the sense that the building owner is paying professionals for the design and then paying other professionals to vet the design for insurers. However, it can be argued that this audit process is good for risk management of the design, workmanship, installation, choice of materials and testing.
Waiver of subrogation rights against architects, engineers and contractors is available but at increased premiums. At present this does not appear to reduce professional indemnity insurance premiums.
The use of latent defects insurance does not mean the end of collateral warranties. Most lawyers take the view when advising developers and tenants, that collateral warranties are still needed to plug any gaps there may be in the extent of cover provided by latent defects insurance. Unlike claims for breach of contract, cover under latent defects insurance is limited to the maximum sum insured, and only certain specified losses are covered. In addition, policies may include an excess (sometimes around 1%).
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Breach of contract.
- Building Users' Insurance Against Latent Defects.
- Collateral warranties.
- Defects.
- Insurance.
- JCT Clause 6.5.1 Insurance.
- Joint names policy.
- Latent defects.
- Legal indemnity insurance.
- Net contribution clauses.
- Post-completion insurance
- Practical completion.
- Professional Indemnity Insurance.
Featured articles and news
Costs and insolvencies mount for SMEs, despite growth
Construction sector under insolvency and wage bill pressure in part linked to National Insurance, says report.
The place for vitrified clay pipes in modern infrastructure
Why vitrified clay pipes are reclaiming their role in built projects.
Research by construction PR consultancy LMC published.
Roles and responsibilities of domestic clients
ACA Safety in Construction guide for domestic clients.
Fire door compliance in UK commercial buildings
Architect and manufacturer gives their low down.
Plumbing and heating for sustainability in new properties
Technical Engineer runs through changes in regulations, innovations in materials, and product systems.
Awareness of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
What CBAM is and what to do about it.
The new towns and strategic environmental assessments
12 locations of the New Towns Taskforce reduced to 7 within the new towns draft programme and open consultation.
Buildings that changed the future of architecture. Book review.
The Sustainability Pathfinder© Handbook
Built environment agency launches free Pathfinder© tool to help businesses progress sustainability strategies.
Government outcome to the late payment consultation, ECA reacts.
IHBC 2025 Gus Astley Student Award winners
Work on the role of hewing in UK historic conservation a win for Jack Parker of Oxford Brookes University.
Future Homes Building Standards and plug-in solar
Parts F and L amendments, the availability of solar panels and industry responses.
How later living housing can help solve the housing crisis
Unlocking homes, unlocking lives.
Preparing safety case reports for HRBs under the BSA
A new practical guide to preparing structural inputs for safety cases and safety case reports published by IStructE.
Male construction workers and prostate cancer
CIOB and Prostate Cancer UK encourage awareness of prostate cancer risks, and what to do about it.






















Comments
Who should pay the latent defects insurance premium for a leasehold property - Developer/ Freeholder/ Leasholder or a mix of all three?