Hold harmless agreement
A hold harmless agreement is a clause typically included in construction contracts, in order not to hold one party liable for the acts of the other. It can be a unilateral or reciprocal agreement and is commonly provided by a subcontractor to the main contractor.
The provisions of such an agreement mean that the risk of being held liable for loss or damage due to the actions of another are minimised and a claim for indemnity can be pursued. In terms of a reciprocal agreement, both parties are covered, i.e. the subcontractor will not be held liable for loss or damage caused by the main contractor and vice versa.
The protection provided by the agreement varies according to the jurisdiction, but in general, they must include an express indemnification, that is, a written agreement that secures or protects a person/party from the legal responsibility of a loss. The named party who that takes responsibility is known as the ‘indemnitor’ while the named party to be protected is known as the ‘indemnitee’.
There are three basic types of hold harmless agreements:
- Broad form: This type holds that the indemnitor will assume all risk for liability regardless of whether responsibility lies with the indemnitee.
- Intermediate form: This is the most commonly used type and holds that the indemnitor will assume all risk for liability unless responsibility lies solely with the indemnitee.
- Limited form: This type holds that the indemnitor will only assume the risk of liability for loss caused by their own actions.
Key features of a hold harmless agreement include:
- Indemnification: The party providing the hold harmless (the indemnitor) agrees to compensate the other party (the indemnitee) for any losses, damages, or legal costs that arise from specific circumstances outlined in the agreement.
- Scope of Protection: Specifies the types of claims or liabilities covered, such as personal injury, property damage, or financial losses related to the construction project.
- Duration: Defines the period during which the hold harmless provisions apply, which could be during the construction phase or extend beyond project completion.
- Exclusions: Identifies any exclusions or limitations to the hold harmless provision, such as negligence or willful misconduct by the indemnitee.
Common scenarios for hold harmless agreements include:
- A contractor may agree to hold the client harmless for any claims arising from the contractor's work, such as accidents or property damage occurring on-site.
- A subcontractor might agree to indemnify the main contractor against any liabilities resulting from the subcontractor’s actions or omissions.
- A supplier may provide a hold harmless agreement protecting the contractor from claims related to defective materials or equipment supplied.
The terms of hold harmless agreements are often heavily negotiated to balance the interests and risk tolerance of both parties. The enforceability of hold harmless agreements can vary depending on the specific wording and circumstances. Courts may scrutinise these clauses, especially if they appear overly broad or unfair. It is essential for parties to have appropriate insurance coverage to back up their indemnity obligations.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.