Hold harmless agreement
A hold harmless agreement is a clause typically included in construction contracts, in order not to hold one party liable for the acts of the other. It can be a unilateral or reciprocal agreement and is commonly provided by a subcontractor to the main contractor.
The provisions of such an agreement mean that the risk of being held liable for loss or damage due to the actions of another are minimised and a claim for indemnity can be pursued. In terms of a reciprocal agreement, both parties are covered, i.e. the subcontractor will not be held liable for loss or damage caused by the main contractor and vice versa.
The protection provided by the agreement varies according to the jurisdiction, but in general, they must include an express indemnification, that is, a written agreement that secures or protects a person/party from the legal responsibility of a loss. The named party who that takes responsibility is known as the ‘indemnitor’ while the named party to be protected is known as the ‘indemnitee’.
There are three basic types of hold harmless agreements:
- Broad form: This type holds that the indemnitor will assume all risk for liability regardless of whether responsibility lies with the indemnitee.
- Intermediate form: This is the most commonly used type and holds that the indemnitor will assume all risk for liability unless responsibility lies solely with the indemnitee.
- Limited form: This type holds that the indemnitor will only assume the risk of liability for loss caused by their own actions.
Key features of a hold harmless agreement include:
- Indemnification: The party providing the hold harmless (the indemnitor) agrees to compensate the other party (the indemnitee) for any losses, damages, or legal costs that arise from specific circumstances outlined in the agreement.
- Scope of Protection: Specifies the types of claims or liabilities covered, such as personal injury, property damage, or financial losses related to the construction project.
- Duration: Defines the period during which the hold harmless provisions apply, which could be during the construction phase or extend beyond project completion.
- Exclusions: Identifies any exclusions or limitations to the hold harmless provision, such as negligence or willful misconduct by the indemnitee.
Common scenarios for hold harmless agreements include:
- A contractor may agree to hold the client harmless for any claims arising from the contractor's work, such as accidents or property damage occurring on-site.
- A subcontractor might agree to indemnify the main contractor against any liabilities resulting from the subcontractor’s actions or omissions.
- A supplier may provide a hold harmless agreement protecting the contractor from claims related to defective materials or equipment supplied.
The terms of hold harmless agreements are often heavily negotiated to balance the interests and risk tolerance of both parties. The enforceability of hold harmless agreements can vary depending on the specific wording and circumstances. Courts may scrutinise these clauses, especially if they appear overly broad or unfair. It is essential for parties to have appropriate insurance coverage to back up their indemnity obligations.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Shortage of high-quality data threatening the AI boom
And other fundamental issues highlighted by the Open Data Institute.
Data centres top the list of growth opportunities
In robust, yet heterogenous world BACS market.
Increased funding for BSR announced
Within plans for next generation of new towns.
New Towns Taskforce interim policy statement
With initial reactions to the 6 month policy update.
Heritage, industry and slavery
Interpretation must tell the story accurately.
PM announces Building safety and fire move to MHCLG
Following recommendations of the Grenfell Inquiry report.
Conserving the ruins of a great Elizabethan country house.
BSRIA European air conditioning market update 2024
Highs, lows and discrepancy rates in the annual demand.
50 years celebrating the ECA Apprenticeship Awards
As SMEs say the 10 years of the Apprenticeship Levy has failed them.
Nominations sought for CIOB awards
Celebrating construction excellence in Ireland and Northern Ireland.
EPC consultation in context: NCM, SAP, SBEM and HEM
One week to respond to the consultation on reforms to the Energy Performance of Buildings framework.
CIAT Celebrates 60 years of Architectural Technology
Find out more #CIAT60 social media takeover.
The BPF urges Chancellor for additional BSR resources
To remove barriers and bottlenecks which delay projects.
Flexibility over requirements to boost apprentice numbers
English, maths and minimumun duration requirements reduced for a 10,000 gain.
A long term view on European heating markets
BSRIA HVAC 2032 Study.
Humidity resilience strategies for home design
Frequency of extreme humidity events is increasing.
National Apprenticeship Week 2025
Skills for life : 10-16 February