Escalation
Civil Engineering Procedure, 7th edition, published by the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) defines ‘escalation’ as an: 'Increases (or decreases) in the costs of labour or materials due to inflation (or recession and deflation).'
Some contracts make provisions for contract price adjustment to allow for the effects of escalation based on data about changes in the cost of commodities, labour, fuel and so on. Such allowances might be referred to as ‘fluctuations’ as there is a fluctuating price in the contract (although fluctuations generally also allow for changes in taxation and increases in head office or administrative costs).
On smaller projects of a short duration, the contractor may be expected to have taken the effects of escalation into account when calculating their price, and they may be able to hold sub-contractors and suppliers to agreed prices for the duration of the contract.
On larger projects, typically lasting more than a year, the contractor may be asked to tender based on prices at an agreed base date, and then the contract makes provisions for escalation to specified items over the duration of the project, such as fuel, steel and so on.
Determining the actual amount of escalation for each item would be very time consuming, and so calculations are generally based on agreed indices, such as public records, JCT bulletins and so on.
Escalation can be caused by issues such as:
- An overheating construction industry.
- Natural disasters.
- Exchange rate changes.
- Changes to regulations.
- Supply problems.
- Labour shortages.
- Inflation in the wider economy, such as fuel price increases or wage increases.
- Global economic conditions.
Escalation clauses put the client at risk, as the final price is not known when the contract is agreed. It is sensible therefore for clients to forecast likely escalation during the course of the project and to make allowances for this, with a contingency provision.
Significant escalation which has not been allowed for can result in the scope of projects being reduced, and can even bring projects to a halt.
However, if there were no escalation provisions, the contractor would have to bear all the risk of price changes, and this would be reflected in their tender.
NB ICMS: Global Consistency in Presenting Construction Life Cycle Costs and Carbon Emissions, 3rd edition, November 2021, published by the ICMS (International Cost Management Standard) Coalition, defines escalation as: ‘A positive or negative factor or rate reflecting an estimate of differential increase/decrease in the general price level for a particular commodity, or group of commodities, or resources (ISO 15686-5).’
See also: Escalation clause and Fluctuations.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
Comments
[edit] To make a comment about this article, or to suggest changes, click 'Add a comment' above. Separate your comments from any existing comments by inserting a horizontal line.