Damage caused by construction works
In construction projects based in urban environments there is always the risk of damage being incurred from or to surrounding structures. This is particularly the case when the construction work involves high levels of noise or vibration, deep excavation, demolition, dewatering, and so on.
However, it is often difficult to differentiate between pre-existing damage and damage caused by construction works, since few structures are completely free of defects or signs of distress. Post-construction examination can involve comparing photographs and elevation surveys to resolve issues surrounding possible damage having been caused.
When significant construction work, such as demolition or excavation, is to be undertaken near to other structures, the developer must carry out a condition survey to assess how the work could feasibly affect its immediate surroundings. This survey will also be used to identify and record any deficiencies in the site or property, such as the extent of cracking prior to work beginning.
The recordings from this survey are used as a ‘base line’ for identifying damage caused by the planned works. Developers can establish the liabilities that may be incurred by them, allowing them to consider special provisions or limitations about the undertaking of the work activities.
It is standard practice for builders to have suitable Contractor’s all-risk insurance, a policy that covers all risks normally associated with a construction project. This will apply should a builder cause damage to the site or adjacent property while carrying out works.
Activities such as pile driving or soil compaction cause vibration which can result in damage to surrounding structures. Ground deformations known as Raleigh waves decrease in intensity as they travel from the source, but depending on the soil type or the fragility of the adjacent structure, they may be sufficiently strong to cause damage.
Damage can also be incurred by the settlement of the soils supporting a new foundation not being uniform. Deep excavations near to existing foundations, or changes in groundwater levels due to dewatering processes, can also result in settlement which can cause building cracking and other defects.
To avoid or reduce the risks of vibration damage, it is often the responsibility of the contractor to maintain vibration levels at below damage thresholds established by building departments or technical standards.
If the owner of an adjacent property has concerns about the potential for vibration to cause damage, they, or their solicitor, can write to the contractor and/or developer, making them aware of their liability to repair any damage should any be incurred. A vibration monitor can be installed, at the cost of the developers, to record levels of vibration and assess whether structurally-significant movement is taking place.
In the event that the developers continue with the work without taking steps to limit vibration, it can be possible to threaten or obtain an injunction to prohibit construction works until acceptable actions have been taken.
Complaints about construction sites can also be made to the local authority, the police, or, if they are registered, the Considerate Constructors Scheme. Concerns about health and safety can be referred to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). For more information, see Complaining about construction sites.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Best practicable means.
- Code of construction practice.
- Complaining about construction sites.
- Considerate Constructors Scheme.
- Contractor’s all risk insurance.
- Cracking and building movement.
- Environmental impact assessment.
- JCT Clause 6.5.1 Insurance.
- Latent defects.
- Noise nuisance.
- Nuisance in construction.
- Quiet period.
- Reasonable skill and care.
- Settlement.
Featured articles and news
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.