Capping clause
A capping clause is a contractual provision that limits the liability of a party to a contract. It sets a maximum limit, or cap, on the amount that one party can be required to pay to the other in the event of a breach of contract, negligence, or other specified circumstances. This is particularly relevant in construction contracts where the financial implications of potential risks and liabilities can be substantial.
For example, a capping clause might state that the contractor's liability for delays is capped at 10% of the contract value. This means that if the project is delayed due to the contractor's fault, the maximum amount the contractor would be liable to pay in damages would be limited to 10% of the total contract price.
Capping clauses help parties manage and allocate financial risks more effectively. By knowing the maximum potential liability, parties can make informed decisions and arrange appropriate insurance coverage. It provides certainty and predictability regarding financial exposure, which is crucial for budgeting and financial planning, and can be a valuable negotiation tool, allowing parties to agree on acceptable levels of risk and reward.
The clause specifies a maximum monetary amount that one party's liability cannot exceed. This limit can be a fixed sum, a percentage of the contract value, or linked to the insurance cover available.
The clause can define which types of liabilities are subject to the cap. This might include direct losses, indirect losses, consequential damages, or specific types of claims such as those arising from defects or delays. Certain types of liabilities are often excluded from the cap. Common exclusions include liabilities for death or personal injury caused by negligence, fraud, and willful misconduct. These exclusions ensure that the cap does not provide protection in cases of serious wrongdoing.
The clause applies to claims arising under the contract, which may include breaches of contract, tort claims (such as negligence), and statutory liabilities.
The cap should be set at a level that reasonably reflects the potential risks and losses that might arise. If set too low, it may not provide sufficient protection for the non-breaching party. Parties often align the cap with the insurance coverage available. It is important to ensure that the cap is consistent with the terms and limits of the relevant insurance policies.
Capping clauses can be mutual, applying to both parties, or unilateral, applying to one party only. The fairness and balance of the clause should be considered during negotiations.
The enforceability of capping clauses can depend on the specific wording and the context in which they are used. Courts may scrutinize these clauses, particularly if they appear to be overly restrictive or unreasonable.
It is essential to carefully draft and negotiate these clauses to ensure they are fair, reasonable, and adequately protect the interests of all parties involved.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Agreement.
- Clause.
- Collateral warranty.
- Construction contract.
- Construction contract conditions.
- Contract administrator.
- Contract negotiations.
- Essentials of a contract.
- Guaranteed maximum price.
- Implied terms.
- Modifying clauses in standard forms of contract.
- Professional indemnity insurance clause in conditions of engagement.
- Standard form of contract.
- The Chancery Lane Project.
- Z clauses.
Featured articles and news
The act of preservation may sometimes be futile.
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.