Capping clause
A capping clause is a contractual provision that limits the liability of a party to a contract. It sets a maximum limit, or cap, on the amount that one party can be required to pay to the other in the event of a breach of contract, negligence, or other specified circumstances. This is particularly relevant in construction contracts where the financial implications of potential risks and liabilities can be substantial.
For example, a capping clause might state that the contractor's liability for delays is capped at 10% of the contract value. This means that if the project is delayed due to the contractor's fault, the maximum amount the contractor would be liable to pay in damages would be limited to 10% of the total contract price.
Capping clauses help parties manage and allocate financial risks more effectively. By knowing the maximum potential liability, parties can make informed decisions and arrange appropriate insurance coverage. It provides certainty and predictability regarding financial exposure, which is crucial for budgeting and financial planning, and can be a valuable negotiation tool, allowing parties to agree on acceptable levels of risk and reward.
The clause specifies a maximum monetary amount that one party's liability cannot exceed. This limit can be a fixed sum, a percentage of the contract value, or linked to the insurance cover available.
The clause can define which types of liabilities are subject to the cap. This might include direct losses, indirect losses, consequential damages, or specific types of claims such as those arising from defects or delays. Certain types of liabilities are often excluded from the cap. Common exclusions include liabilities for death or personal injury caused by negligence, fraud, and willful misconduct. These exclusions ensure that the cap does not provide protection in cases of serious wrongdoing.
The clause applies to claims arising under the contract, which may include breaches of contract, tort claims (such as negligence), and statutory liabilities.
The cap should be set at a level that reasonably reflects the potential risks and losses that might arise. If set too low, it may not provide sufficient protection for the non-breaching party. Parties often align the cap with the insurance coverage available. It is important to ensure that the cap is consistent with the terms and limits of the relevant insurance policies.
Capping clauses can be mutual, applying to both parties, or unilateral, applying to one party only. The fairness and balance of the clause should be considered during negotiations.
The enforceability of capping clauses can depend on the specific wording and the context in which they are used. Courts may scrutinize these clauses, particularly if they appear to be overly restrictive or unreasonable.
It is essential to carefully draft and negotiate these clauses to ensure they are fair, reasonable, and adequately protect the interests of all parties involved.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Agreement.
- Clause.
- Collateral warranty.
- Construction contract.
- Construction contract conditions.
- Contract administrator.
- Contract negotiations.
- Essentials of a contract.
- Guaranteed maximum price.
- Implied terms.
- Modifying clauses in standard forms of contract.
- Professional indemnity insurance clause in conditions of engagement.
- Standard form of contract.
- The Chancery Lane Project.
- Z clauses.
Featured articles and news
The restoration of the novelist’s birthplace in Eastwood.
PAC report on the Remediation of Dangerous Cladding
Recommendations on workforce, transparency, support, insurance, funding, fraud and mismanagement.
New towns, expanded settlements and housing delivery
Modular inquiry asks if new towns and expanded settlements are an effective means of delivering housing.
Building Engineering Business Survey Q1 2025
Survey shows growth remains flat as skill shortages and volatile pricing persist.
Construction contract awards remain buoyant
Infrastructure up but residential struggles.
Home builders call for suspension of Building Safety Levy
HBF with over 100 home builders write to the Chancellor.
CIOB Apprentice of the Year 2024/2025
CIOB names James Monk a quantity surveyor from Cambridge as the winner.
Warm Homes Plan and existing energy bill support policies
Breaking down what existing policies are and what they do.
Treasury responds to sector submission on Warm Homes
Trade associations call on Government to make good on manifesto pledge for the upgrading of 5 million homes.
A tour through Robotic Installation Systems for Elevators, Innovation Labs, MetaCore and PORT tech.
A dynamic brand built for impact stitched into BSRIA’s building fabric.
BS 9991:2024 and the recently published CLC advisory note
Fire safety in the design, management and use of residential buildings. Code of practice.