Bidding tactics
“Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy are the noise before defeat.”
--Sun Tzu (544 BC – 496 BC)
[edit] Introduction
When a contractor or other supplier wishes to secure work for its business, it will usually submit a proposal (a ‘tender’, 'quote' or ‘bid’) to a prospective client and in so doing becomes a ‘bidder’. The bid is a detailed description of how the supplier will manage and complete the works required if chosen by the client.
This will involve bidding tactics - specific, small steps (or micro actions) the company takes in order to secure the work. These small steps combine to form a broader bid strategy (or macro action).
In the most basic sense, tactics can help companies define HOW to accomplish a goal while strategies define WHAT the goal will be. Generally, that goal will be to win the bid.
In a practical sense, the bid strategy will inform the definition of the bidding tactics. For more information see: Bid strategies.
[edit] Components of bidding tactics
Tactical decisions may come in the form of estimates or approximations of what materials, tools, personnel and other resources could be required for the project. For example, when working on a demolition project, a tactical question may be, ‘is there a need to include an estimate for a skip?’ The answer to this tactical question will be reflected in bid.
One tactic is to submit the most accurate bid possible. However, it's important not to reveal specific information, especially related to price or execution plans, to other potential bidders. Tactics may also include money saving factors that can be incorporated into the bid.
Having the ability to recognise important bidding tactics may require managerial skills and experience in the field. An effective project manager who can manage the process and make decisions on priorities, will ideally arrive at solutions that are advantageous for the project as a whole.
Bidding tactics will vary from project to project. Some of the factors that could influence how to bid (or tactical approaches) may include:
- The type of work.
- Project size and duration.
- The complexity of the project.
- The clarity and detail of the information provided.
- The type of employer: Public employers can be more process-driven and require more complex submittal procedures.
- The location of the project.
- Equipment availability: estimators should be mindful of the availability of expensive equipment across bids and projects.
- The availability of team and management: Projects may be bid with particular project team members in mind who may have specific expertise or experience.
- The number of bidders: Some projects will receive more bids than others. The odds of winning are greater on those with fewer bidders.
- Competition: only a few contractors will be likely to offer serious competition on any one bid. Being aware of their workload gives a better indication of which projects to bid for.
- The time of year.
- Whether the contractor has prior experience with a project that is similar.
- Confidence in the prices provided by subcontractors for the project.
- The state of the market - whether busy or slow.
- Whether there is an existing relationship with the employer.
- The opportunity for follow-on work from the same employer.
- Confidence in external events such as interest rates, inflation, and so on.
- How busy they are on other projects. Being busy may mean they enter higher bids, whereas if they are less busy they may enter lower bids that offer less profit.
- The amount and value of subcontracted work.
- Variations in productivity. As a trend, workers tend to be more productive when labour is readily available, whereas they are less so when labour is more scarce.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.