Air-rights buildings
There is a great demand for new development in the UK, whether to satisfy commercial needs, or to supply the housing market. However, as our cities become more congested, not only greenfield, but also brownfield plots become more rare. In addition, protections such as conservation area status, listed buildings and so on can make it difficult to clear sites for redevelopment. It has become more common therefore to consider developing below existing properties, in basements, and also above them (often termed 'overbuild').
Generally, the owner of a property will also own the rights to the air above the property that they could reasonably use (excluding the flight paths of aircraft). That is, they may, subject to planning permission, be able to develop above their property. However, these rights can be sold or leased, enabling the construction of ‘air-rights’ buildings. Typically, air-rights buildings are constructed above existing infrastructure such as roads or railways, or over buildings such as low-rise shopping centres that may have been developed when space was at less of a premium.
Being built over existing assets means that no land is required for these developments - which is a huge bonus for high-density, urban locations. In inner cities, air rights buildings may increase public transport ridership, which in turn means less congestion and emissions and so constitutes a more sustainable solution to urban development. Furthermore, they may offer financial incentives for asset owners who may benefit from the development.
The first air-rights building in the UK was One Embankment Place, a commercial office building for PwC constructed above Charing Cross station and completed in 1991. Not only did it build above Charing Cross station, but its services and lifts pass through the station itself. Other air-rights buildings include; Alban Gate at London Wall; Broadgate in the City of London and the Cannon Place development above Cannon Street Station.
Air-rights buildings can be extremely complex, requiring negotiations with multiple owners and occupants, as well as considerations which may include a requirement to keep existing facilities running, issues to do with structural disturbance, access, safety and security. This has inevitably meant that air-rights buildings tend to be more expensive, they take longer and represent a higher risk than simply building on the ground. However, following an initial spate of air-rights buildings in the 1990s, there is fresh interest in the idea because of the lack of availability of more straightforward sites. While the acute shortage of affordable housing in the UK has seen developers and local authorities consider creating residences above stations and rail lines (rail overbuild).
In addition, reliable technologies have been developed that ensure sound and vibrations are not transferred from existing structures (such as railways) to new air-rights buildings.
In the USA, air rights can be traded as Transferrable Development Rights (TDR). The rights to construct to a certain level of density above an existing building (typically a heritage building such as a church) are traded with the owner of another plot, enabling them to develop a at greater density (or higher) than would otherwise have been permitted.
In 2014, a report by global engineering consultancy WSP, 'Building our way out of a crisis - can we capitalise on London's public assets to provide homes for the future?' suggested that building above public assets in London could provide space for up to 630,000 new homes.
WSP continued its studies into the subject with the publication of two reports on building above railway infrastructure, both of which demonstrated the potential for substantial housing gains:
- In 2018, it published 'Out of Thin Air'
- Followed in 2019 by 'Out of Thin Air - One-Year On' (download PDF)
In February 2019, it was announced that Homes England has agreed a £9 million funding deal with 'airspace' developer Apex Airspace Developments to build homes on London rooftops in Tooting, Wanstead, Walthamstow, Putney and Wallington. Ref https://www.gov.uk/government/news/brokenshire-unveils-500-million-affordable-homes-funding-boost--2
NB: the term 'oversite development' (or overbuild) refers to a new construction that does not interfere with and is not related to the operation of an exsisting scheme, and which can be built over and around the scheme’s operational structures (e.g above stations).
In Scottish land law, the term 'A coelo usque ad centrum', meaning ‘from the sky (or heavens) to the centre’ refers to the ownership of land in Scotland, which generally includes everything above and everything under the land - through to the centre (of the earth)
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
Comments