Collaborative Reporting for Safer Structures UK
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Collaborative Reporting for Safer Structures UK (CROSS-UK) is a collaborative body that compiles and publishes free safety information for built environment professionals. Formerly known as the Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety, CROSS was founded in 2005 as a system for the collation of data on matters of concern relating to structural safety.
CROSS operates internationally; following in the footsteps of CROSS-UK, the IStructE launched in Australia with CROSS-AUS in 2018 and then in 2019 the network grew to the US with CROSS-US formed by the Structural Engineering Institute (SEI) of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
[edit] Background
The establishment of the CROSS safety reporting system was based on work by the Standing Committee on Structural Safety (SCOSS). In 2012, SCOSS and CROSS were officially aligned under the name Structural-Safety.
In 2018, CROSS was incorporated into the recommendations of the Hackitt report. The system was specifically mentioned under recommendation 1.4c, which states, ‘For all other buildings, the current CROSS scheme should be extended and strengthened to cover all engineering safety concerns and should be subject to formal review and reporting at least annually.’
After discussions between Structural-Safety and the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG), funding for CROSS-UK was increased in 2020 to include fire safety in compliance with the aforementioned recommendations in the report. The CROSS system expanded in 2021 to include structural safety as well as fire safety and all three entities - Structural-Safety, SCOSS and CROSS - are united to operate under a new name, Collaborative Reporting for Safer Structures (CROSS).
[edit] Importance of safety reporting
The new name for the organisation is meant to illustrate the connection and to respond to the overlap - both professional and physical - between structural safety and fire safety. CROSS will continue to provide built environment professionals the opportunity to make confidential reports when they witness either type of safety issue.
The information collected in the reports is confidential, but it is shared with a panel of expert volunteers who review and comment on findings to provide additional insight into incidents. In addition to educating others about the importance of identifying and relaying structural safety issues and building incidents (such as near misses), reports are intended to:
- Promote culture change.
- Share lessons learned.
- Find issues that could foreshadow risk.
- Identify shortfalls or vulnerabilities.
- Improve competency through training.
- Support regulatory activities.
- Inform professional education activities.
- Create proactive attitudes about preventing safety risks.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Fire prevention on construction sites.
- Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report.
- Health and safety.
- Health and safety for building design and construction.
- Independent review of the building regulations and fire safety.
- Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).
- Reporting accidents and injuries on construction sites.
- The design of temporary structures and wind adjacent to tall buildings.
Featured articles and news
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from constructuon and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
The increasing costs of repair and remediation
Highlighted by regulator of social housing, as acceleration plan continues.
Free topic guide on mould in buildings
The new TG 26/2024 published by BSRIA.
Greater control for LAs over private rental selective licensing
A brief explanation of changes with the NRLA response.
Practice costs for architectural technologists
Salary standards and working out what you’re worth.
The Health and Safety Executive at 50
And over 200 years of Operational Safety and Health.
Thermal imaging surveys a brief intro
Thermal Imaging of Buildings; a pocket guide BG 72/2017.