Henry Boot Construction Ltd v Alstom Combined Cycles
The case of ‘Henry Boot Construction Ltd. v Alstom Combined Cycles’ [1999] set a precedent that contractor’s rates do not become reasonable or unreasonable by the execution of variations.
The extent to which bill of quantities (BoQ) rates are applicable for valuing variations in the works, is a common cause of conflict on projects, particularly when there are substantial changes in quantities. This can be a particular issue if the rate in question is abnormally high or low due to the fact that an error has been incurred. Contractors argue that abnormally low rates compound losses, while clients point out that abnormally high rates exaggerate contractor profits.
In the case of Henry Boot Construction Ltd. v Alstom Combined Cycles, Henry Boot Construction Ltd. was employed by Alstom to undertake civil engineering works at a power station. Boot quoted a price for temporary sheet piling and this figure was included in the contract. As the works proceeded however, variation instructions affecting the sheet piling were issued.
Boot’s price was found to have been calculated incorrectly, meaning that the additional quantity required by the variation would have given them a large profit. Boot argued that the contract rates must be adhered to whereas Alstom argued that a fair valuation should be made.
At the trial, the judge emphasised the importance of the contract rates, ruling that they were ‘sacrosanct, immutable, and not subject to correction’ on the basis of one party’s dissatisfaction with them. He referred to Clause 55(2) in the relevant ICE Standard Form (6th ed.) contract which stipulated that there should be no rectification of errors, omissions or estimates, and that a mistake in a rate or price bound both parties equally.
The Court of Appeal endorsed the judge’s ruling in 2000, confirming that pricing errors do not allow the parties to adjust the rates.
The rates may however be adjusted where they are used to value variations:
- Where the works are not executed under similar conditions.
- Where the rate is rendered inapplicable by a substantial change in the quantities.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.