Difference between cofferdams and caissons
Cofferdams and caissons are both structures that are used when undertaking construction works in areas submerged in under water.
The main difference between the two is that a cofferdam is a temporary structure which is removed after completion of the work, whereas a caisson is built to remain in place as part of the completed structure.
The aim of a cofferdam is to be as watertight as possible to create a dry area in which to carry out the required works, or at least to limit water ingress to a safe level that can be pumped away.
A caisson is typically a box-like structure made of materials such as timber, steel, masonry and reinforced concrete. It may be constructed onshore then floated to the required location, where it is sunk into place, enabling access to the bed to undertake works.
The type of structure being built will determine whether a caisson or a cofferdam is most suitable. The two principal factors influencing the choice are the ground conditions and the depth to which the work is to be taken. In general, cofferdams are suitable for depths of up to 18 m below high water level, while caissons are more suitable for greater depths.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
A call for prevention and sensitive re-use.
The CIAT principal designer register
Providing assurance and verification of the capability and competence of registered ATs.
Building Safety recommendations and Northern Ireland
The NI roadmap to improving safety in high rise residential.
BSA residential sector competence standards guidance
BSAS 01:2024 Organisational Capability Management System Standard - Competence Assurance.
Specifying rendered external wall insulation for fire safety
How to interrogate the evidence provided to the specifier.
The benefits of writing articles for your organisation
How to create a profile for your organisation and publish for free.
No Falls Week. The importance of safe working at height
What to expect and what is on offer to avoid accidents.
Scottish Government action to reach net-zero targets
Retrofit expert group highlight critical actions needed.
A forward thinking, inclusive global community of members.
From engineered product life-spans, to their extension.
Circular economy in the built environment
A brief description from 2021. Where are we now?
CLC publishes domestic retrofit competency framework
Roadmap of Skills for net zero.
Understanding is key to conservation.
Open industry engagement survey seeks responses
Institutions and the importance of engagement.