BREEAM Protection of ecological features
Contents |
[edit] Aim and benefits
To protect existing ecological features from substantial damage during site preparation and completion of construction works. Often consideration is not given to the fact established ecological features have taken years to grow and develop. Their value is not easily replaced and removal of them has lasting effects.
[edit] When to consider
Before RIBA stage 1 where possible. A site inspection by an ecologist must be carried out before any works begin on the chosen site. If an area of the site needs to be protected then the design and works will have to work around that and the earlier this is known the better.
[edit] Step by step guidance
This credit can only be achieved if the assessment zone is defined as ‘land of low ecological value’.
It is recommended that a suitably qualified ecologist be procured from the earliest point.
Before procuring an ecologist, it should be checked that they are suitably qualified in line with BREEAM requirements.
If using an ecologist, they will need to carry out a site inspection prior to any works beginning on site and at appropriate times of the year to determine if there is any ecological value in the site. If the overall value of the site is low the credit will be achievable but if there is value the site cannot gain the credit. See compliance notes in the BREEAM manual if the site was cleared prior to purchase.
Where the ecologist confirms the overall value is low but there are some features that should be retained and protected during construction these should be highlighted to the design team as early as possible.
The contractor should know they must put in place protection measures before they are appointed.
Before site works being the protection measures recommended by the suitably qualified ecologist should be put in place. BS42020:2013 should be consulted by the ecologist and for best practice the contractor. These measures may be protection around existing trees, rivers or ponds. Specific measures to prevent water pollution. Siting and timing of all construction-type activities to avoid harm to important nature conservation features. Erection of information or warning signs for site workers specifying location, type and means of installation. Erection of wildlife exclusion barriers to prevent, where necessary, particular species (e.g. water voles, badgers, amphibians and reptiles) from moving from one area or feature to another.
If any features of value have been removed from the site pre-of post purchase then credit cannot be achieved.
[edit] Questions to ask while seeking compliance
What state is the site in?
Is it mostly hard standing?
Is it a greenfield site or a brown field site?
What surrounds the site, urban, semi rural, rural?
Are there any derelict buildings?
Are there trees on site, if so are they established?
[edit] Tools and resources
Knowledge base - http://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/landuseandecology/le02/
BS42020:2013 can be purchased from a number of suppliers such as - https://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030258704
[edit] Tips and best practice
Good ecologist used from the earliest point.
It should be noted the assessment zone is defined as any land on the site which is being developed (and therefore disturbed) for buildings, hard standing, soft landscaping, site access, plus a 3m wide zone measured outward from the boundary around these areas irrespective of site boundary. It also includes any areas used for temporary site storage and buildings.
[edit] Typical evidence
Ecology report produced by suitably qualified ecologist.
Confirmation ecologist is suitably qualified
Site photographs
Confirmation from the design team/contractor that the features of value will be protected in line with the ecologists recommendations.
[edit] Applicable Schemes
The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See this document for further guidelines.
- UK New Construction 2014
BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.
--Emma Houston 11:44, 18 Jan 2018 (BST)
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Biodiversity in the urban environment.
- Biodiversity offsetting.
- Biodiversity net gain consultation.
- BREEAM Ecological value of site.
- BREEAM Enhancing site ecology.
- BREEAM Minimising impact on existing site ecology.
- Ecological baseline.
- Ecological impact assessment.
- Ecological network.
- Ecological survey.
- Ecologist.
- Ecology compensation.
- Habitat Suitability Index.
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.