Design responsibility matrix
Building design was traditionally carried out by a small team of consultants working for a client, who would complete the design before seeking tenders from contractors to carry out the works. However, as buildings have become more complex, design and construction have begun to overlap, a wide range of specialist designers have emerged, contractors have taken on more of a managerial role, and the whole supply chain has become engaged in the design process. As a result, it is increasingly important to define precisely who is responsible for which part of the design.
A design responsibility matrix (DRM) sets out responsibility for each element of the design at each stage of the design development process and to what level of detail. It might be accompanied by the development of a contractual tree, illustrating the contractual relationship between the participants in the project. It can also be accompanied by a project roles table that sets out the overall roles required for a project.
Preparation of a design responsibility matrix should begin early in the development of the project. It may start with a simple, strategic overview of design responsibility for the main design elements. As the project progresses, however, it should increase in detail to allocate responsibility for specific elements, systems and products, setting out the level of detail and format of design information to be produced and any requirement for collateral warranties.
It is important that design responsibilities are clearly defined and properly understood before tender documentation is prepared or appointments made.
The client may wish to allocate the roles of lead designer and lead consultant to co-ordinate the work of designers. It might also be appropriate to appoint a design co-ordinator (for the co-ordination and integration of design prepared by specialist contractors) and a computer aided design (CAD) and/or building information modelling (BIM) co-ordinator and BIM information manager. Contractors may appoint their own design managers to co-ordinate their own design and that of sub-contractors.
On projects where BIM is adopted, a design responsibility matrix may form part of the Employer's Information Requirements (EIR).
The RIBA Plan of Work 2013 defines the design responsibility matrix as: A matrix that sets out who is responsible for designing each aspect of the project and when. This document sets out the extent of any performance specified design. The Design Responsibility Matrix is created at a strategic level at Stage 1 and fine tuned in response to the Concept Design at the end of Stage 2 in order to ensure that there are no design responsibility ambiguities at Stages 3, 4 and 5.’
The RIBA Plan of Work toolbox provides a pro-forma design responsibility matrix, with each aspect of the design coded according to the Uniclass2 classification system.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Contractual tree.
- Design liability.
- Design management.
- Design management plan.
- Design manager.
- Design programme.
- Design team.
- Design web.
- Employer's information requirements.
- Lead consultant.
- Lead designer.
- Project roles table.
- Uniclass 2.
- RACI matrix.
[edit] External references
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.