Joinder
This is the joining of a person/s to an action where common questions of law or fact arise.
Many construction disputes are resolved by the major participants to being joined in one proceeding. The benefit of this is that all related disputes are dealt with at once, with the consistency of being resolved by a single judge, jury, adjudicator, arbitration panel and so on.
If a dispute is subject to arbitration, as specified in the contract, then these provisions govern the issue of whether multiple parties can be joined in one arbitration (joinder).
For example, where design flaws are alleged to have contributed to a defect in the construction works, employers may seek to have the design professional(s) added as a party to proceedings to either defend their services or accept liability. Alternatively, two claimants could have a joint right, for example where there are joint contractors suing another party to the contract.
In adjudication proceedings, a party may at any time request additional parties to be joined, subject to the agreement of the adjudicator, existing parties and the additional parties.
When courts are presented with a claim comprising a number of causes of action or parties that have been joined together, they have the power to separate them if the joinder is regarded as inconvenient. This could be because the joinder makes the claim unnecessarily complicated, or may cause delays or increase the costs in the claim.
An alternative to joinder is consolidation. This involves two or more separate claims with a strong link with each other being continued together with one claim being nominated as the lead. For example, this could be appropriate when the same allegations of negligence or breach of contract are made against the same defendant but in relation to different claims. Again, the court must exercise their power to consolidate claims with consideration of the time and cost implications.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki:
- Adjudication.
- Arbitration.
- Construction Industry Model Arbitration Rules CIMAR.
- Construction litigation.
- Contribution and apportionment.
- Damages in construction contracts.
- Decennial liability.
- Good faith in construction contracts.
- Legal and equitable assignment
- Negligence in building design and construction.
- Novation.
- Recovery of third party losses.
[edit] External references
- ‘The Construction Contracts Book’ (2nd ed.), BRENNAN, D.S. et al, American Bar Association (2008)
- InBrief - Joining participants and causes of action
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.