Ir35
IR 35 (or 'Intermediaries Legislation') was introduced by HM Revenues and Customs (HMRC) in 2000.
The reason for the introduction of IR35 was HMRC’s belief that the Exchequer was losing substantial amounts of tax and national insurance due to the use, by individuals, of service companies or self-employed status in circumstances where, in reality, they were employees who should be subject to full Pay As You Earn (PAYE) rules.
This is because the tax and national insurance collected by HMRC via PAYE is greater than it would be from self-employed individuals or from those who route their income through service companies.
In particular HMRC were concerned about these practices in the IT and construction industries where the use of consultants is widespread.
IR35 sets out the general rules which individuals must apply to their own circumstances. There are a variety of tests which should be applied in considering whether or not PAYE applies and it should be emphasised that these are matters which are of relevance to both sides of a contract to perform services. This is because there are potentially costly consequences for both parties in the event that IR 35 is not applied correctly.
For the party paying for the services there is the possibility that HMRC will deem amounts paid to be net of tax and national insurance and thereby 'gross up' these amounts and demand the difference from the paying party.
And for the party providing the services there could also be additional tax to pay as expenses incurred in providing those services would be severely limited, and of course, the likelihood would be that the employing party would seek to recover from the service provider any additional tax it had to pay to HMRC .
So it is important to ensure that these rules are understood and observed. Guidance is provided by HMRC and as part of this guidance a number of 'business entity' tests have been published any of which could be used as part of an assessment as to whether someone is employed or self-employed.
These tests are:
- Does the business have any premises?
- Does the business buy its own professional indemnity insurance?
- Does the business use other workers?
- Does the business spend more than £100 per month on advertising?
- Was the business owner previously working for the same customer under PAYE?
- Would the business have to bear the cost of rectifying its own mistakes?
- Does the business stand the risk of incurring bad debts?
- Is there negotiation over pay rates?
- Can the business substitute one person for another, and have they ever done so?
- Can the business make more profit by changing the way it works?
- Does the business have a business plan?
IR35 does not threaten those who have set up their own businesses and who are genuinely self-employed. It targets those which would otherwise be classed as 'employees' when carrying out a particular contract. It applies on a contract by contract basis, so it is not the case that if a self-employed person has only one client, IR35 automatically applies. What matters are the terms and the conditions which apply to each individual contract. It is perfectly possible for an individual to have several contracts running concurrently, one of which falls within IR35 and to which PAYE rules apply.
Care is therefore essential in drafting contract terms in order to ensure that a contract does not inadvertently become subject to PAYE as a consequence of failing to take full account of IR 35
Contents |
[edit] 2020 changes
From April 2020, medium and large 'engagers' will become responsible for assessing an individual’s employment status and deducting the right amount of tax and National Insurance contributions. Changes to Part 2 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA 2003) are intended to increase compliance with the existing off-payroll working rules in the private and third sectors to ensure fairness between individuals working in a similar way. Ref https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rules-for-off-payroll-working-from-april-2020
However, in November 2019, Chancellor Sajid Javid told Radio 4’s Money Box; ‘We will be having a review and I think it makes sense to include IR35 in that review.”
In January 2020, the review was confirmed, with a call for evidence. Financial Secretary to the Treasury Jesse Norman said: “We recognise that concerns have been raised about the forthcoming reforms to the off-payroll working rules. The purpose of this consultation is to make sure that the implementation of these changes in April is as smooth as possible.”
Following the call for evidence, the Budget 2020 stated: 'The government believes it is right to address the fundamental unfairness of the non-compliance with the existing rules, and the reform will therefore be legislated in Finance Bill 2020 and implemented on 6 April 2020, as previously announced.'
However, on 17 March 2020, Chief secretary to the Treasury Steve Barclay told the House of Commons: “...that the government are postponing the reforms to the off-payroll working rules IR35 from April 2020 to 6th April 2021.”
On 27 April 2020, The House of Lords Economic Affairs Finance Bill Sub-Committee published a report urging the government to completely rethink the IR35 legislation. Ref https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5801/ldselect/ldeconaf/50/50.pdf
On 19 May 2020, an amendment to the Finance Bill seeking to further delay the introduction of the reforms was voted down by the House of Commons.
[edit] 2021
Despite intense lobbying and criticism, the new rules came into force on 6 April 2021 with responsibility for determining employment status moving to the employer.
[edit] 2022
In the Mini Budget following the selection of Liz Truss as leader of the Conservative Party, and so Prime Minister, chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng announded that the IR35 reforms introduced in 2017 and 2021 would be repealed. The statement suggested that this would: “...free up time and money for businesses that engage contractors, that could be put towards other priorities.”
Despite Kwarteng saying at the end of September that from April 2023 the system would revert back to its original rules with freelance workers assessing their own tax, 3 weeks later in October Jeremy Hunt replacing Kwarteng as chancellor announced "We will no longer be proceeding with the reversal of off-payroll working reforms."
--Martinc
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Appointing consultants.
- Business plan.
- Construction contract.
- Construction Industry Scheme or IR35?
- Court of appeal ruling on holiday pay and employment status.
- December 2020 GDP figures show construction vulnerable.
- Gangmaster.
- Hourly rate.
- IR35: essential steps for compliance.
- PAYE.
- Payroll companies.
- Personal service company.
- Professional indemnity insurance.
- Status determination statement SDS.
- TUPE Regulations.
- Umbrella companies.
[edit] External references
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.