Vendor Managed Inventory VMI
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) is a business model in which an organisation sets up an arrangement with a vendor and the vendor not only supplies goods but also manages and optimises the inventory from various distributors.
[edit] Establishing the relationship
This arrangement allows the organisation to delegate responsibilities associated with procurement and supply chain management to a third party service provider. This service may be handled by a vendor that provides parts, equipment and maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) materials. By being relieved of certain activities, a company is able to focus on its core competencies and forward planning activities while asking its service provider to enhance value chain engagement.
A Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) arrangement is sometimes used by small to medium sized businesses that do not have the in-house expertise to manage supply chain logistics or the space to maintain stock. The arrangement relies on clear communication between the organisation and the vendor in order to ensure proper inventory levels are available.
Some vendors provide the warehousing facilities for materials. Others manage inventory in space that is located directly on the organisation’s premises.
[edit] Advantages and disadvantages
Vendor Inventory Management is a form of business process outsourcing (BPO). As with many outsourcing arrangements, both the organisation and the service provider are exposed to some degree of risk. The parties become dependent on one another for success and this requires a change in culture, attitude and procedures throughout the supply chain.
For the customer, the benefits can include:
- Staff are free to focus on core competency areas.
- Inventory levels can be monitored and managed efficiently.
- Supply chains can be managed in an expert and proactive manner.
- It gives the client the opportunity to learn about inventory management best practices from the vendor.
Customer disadvantages can include:
- Reliance on a relationship that may be vulnerable to external factors.
- Less control over inventory issues.
- Possible security concerns over proprietary information associated with the organisation.
- The potential to lose the advantages of open competition from suppliers.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.