Minor material amendment
It is sometimes necessary to amend development proposals after planning permission has been granted.
Where these are not significant amendments, they may be described as ‘non-material’. Section 96A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, amended by the Planning Act 2008, permits applications for non-material amendment to planning permissions. This avoids the need for a new planning application to be submitted, allowing instead for the existing permission to be amended whilst remaining subject to the original conditions and time limits.
An amendment that is considered to be more significant than a non-material amendment will require a new application. This may be an application for a 'minor material amendment' to the existing planning permission, or if the change is not considered to be a minor material amendment, then a new planning application will be required.
There is no statutory definition of what ‘minor material amendment’ means, instead, local authorities are responsible for deciding, given the local context in each case. However, the government suggests that minor material amendments are likely to include any amendment where its scale and/or nature results in a development which is not substantially different from the one which has been approved, and recommends that pre-application discussions should be used to determine whether an amendment is a minor material amendment before an application is submitted. (Ref. Planning practice guidance.)
This might include changes where:
- The site boundary is not changed
- The siting, landscape, scale and height is not significantly changed
- The use is not changed.
- The appearance is not adversely affected.
- The change is compliant with local planning policy and with the conditions attached to the original permission.
- Changes to windows or other openings that do not impact on neighbouring properties.
- The interests of parties consulted about the original application are not disadvantaged.
An application for a minor material amendment can be made under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, allowing conditions associated with the existing permission to be varied or removed. This can be used to vary a condition that lists the drawings associated with the existing planning permission. If there is no such condition, one may be added using an application under section 96A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and then a section 73 application to vary that condition.
Applications can be made using a ‘variation or removal of condition' form accompanied by drawings describing the nature of the amendment and an application fee. The local authority have the discretion to decide who should be consulted about the application and the approach that should be taken to notification.
A decision should be made in eight weeks (or 13 weeks for major applications) and has the effect of creating a new planning permission alongside the original permission. The decision notice should set out any conditions attached to the original permission which have not been discharged, along with any conditions attached to the new permission.
This process does not apply to listed building consents or to applications in conservation areas for which a complete new application must be made.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Alterations to existing buildings.
- Detailed planning application.
- Material alteration.
- Material amendment.
- Material change of use.
- National Planning Policy Framework.
- National Planning Practice Guidance.
- Non material amendment.
- Outline planning application.
- Permitted development.
- Planning authority.
- Planning conditions.
- Planning consultant.
- Planning enforcement.
- Planning obligations.
- Pre-application advice.
- Section 106 agreement.
[edit] External references
Featured articles and news
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA has launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.
Comments
Hello there,
Conservation Consent was abolished in 2013 (https://historicengland.org.uk/advice/planning/consents/conservationareaconsent/)
When you mention Conservation Consent, do you just mean 'planning applications made in a Conservation Area'?
Clarification would be much appreciated.
Best wishes
The article has been corrected to refer to applications in conservation areas, rather that conservation area consents, which as you rightly point our are no longer required.