Emotional architecture
Arushi Malhotra talks about the psychological power of the built environment and its effect on the human mind to evoke different emotions in its users by picking up body and spatial cues.
When we think about architecture, we often perceive it as a physical entity – something that has a structure or a built form. The pandemic has brought a lot of attention towards the connection it holds with the physical health of its users, with a lot of people now being aware and conscious about their Indoor Air Quality and building microbiomes. The question that emerges now is, do our spaces impact our psychological well-being as well or do they just affect our physical health? Can the built environment effect and even alter our mood? Does it affect our productivity? Can spaces evoke emotions?
Emotions are the essence of our entire existence. We exercise emotions in everything that we do – in whatever we see, hear, touch, smell, or taste – our perception about all the things that we encounter in our life is based on the emotional response it elicits in us. Emotions not only help us in experiencing our surroundings fully, but they also communicate to us what aids and hinders our survival. While the concept of emotions is often put under the umbrella of psychology, architecture and built domain has their fair share of relevance in it. In general, we look at architecture and design as physical entity – a structure or a built form only. But we fail to understand the profound connection it has with human emotions.
From open spaces like parks, streets, plazas, squares, parade grounds; to residences, commercial, institutional, monumental, or public structures, the built environment stands proud as a representation of the people – reflecting their beliefs, values, successes and downfalls, experiences, events, economic status – thus making architecture and design an integral part of our lives. Everything around us is symbolic, everything evokes an emotion. If we break our experiences (both good and bad) into their smallest controllable parts, the results indicate that spaces have always had a physiological impact on us. While natural, green, open, and aesthetically pleasing landscapes and well-designed spaces stir a sense of awe in its users and make them feel more relaxed, happy, connected, and engaged; poorly designed, sterile, concrete, dense hardscapes have been proven to increase stress levels in its users and making them feel bored, irritated, claustrophobic or even depressed. This strong connection between the built environment and emotions happens when the users are interacting with the space.
Emotional architecture is a sublime act of poetic imagination which involves the user's body and mind. Experiencing a built form does not relate only to its spaces, form, and surfaces, but also in listening to its characteristic dialogues. As a user enters a space, a space enters the user as well. The experience is essentially the exchange and fusion of the object and the subject.
There are two levels at which architecture interacts and enhances its users experience. One is through cognition level — where the user is involved in processing and appraising the perceived information, and the other is at the emotional level- which is often understood as the adaptive reactions to the perceived information. Both interactions operate through closely interrelated systems. Where human emotion is a response to the design elements presented to them. The elements like water, light, color, form, style, materials, sound, and details incite feelings that empower the user to engage, excite, endure, interest, relax, stress, etc. In other words, how the design exudes a “sense of place”. This helps the architecture in taking a particular personality to trigger emotions in its user and connect with them.
Apart from evoking emotions, design has the power to enforce emotions as well. It is a strong tool that can be used by the designers to stimulate and direct a particular emotional response in its users which in turn not just maximize the potential and investment returns of the space but also enhances user experience of that space. This is often done by simulating the activities of the user and their behavioral patterns in the given spatial setting. As designers there are various ways in which we can mould and stimulate this experience in the spaces that we design. This multi-faceted stimulus can be achieved by using/altering the following:
- Volume and space planning – altering the flow of space to enhance impact, sense of journey or arrival.
- Light – using the light spills and shadows to create a sense of intimacy or drama.
- Colour – this involves implementation and strategic use of colour psychology in spaces.
- Texture - where coarse textures can evoke sense of disturbance, anger, or confusion while smooth surfaces elicit a sense of calmness on its users.
- Patterns - this involves using patterns to create illusions in our spaces.
- Sound – from maintaining the permissible noise levels to the selection of music and careful zoning of areas which is specific to their prominent function and activities.
- Ventilation - well-lit and ventilated spaces increase the user comfort in the spaces in turn affecting their productivity.
- Indoor and outdoor Landscape - this involves careful and strategic integration of nature in the spaces.
This article appears on the CIAT news and blog site as "Emotional architecture" dated December 19 and was written by Arushi Malhotra.
--Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists CIAT
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Arts and Crafts Churches.
- Air quality in the built environment.
- Constant air volume CAV.
- Indoor air quality.
- Sound v noise..
- Space.
- The impact of the design of the psychiatric inpatient facility on perceptions of carer wellbeing.
- Variable air volume VAV.
- Volume of buildings.
- Wood and spiritual places
Featured articles and news
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from constructuon and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
The increasing costs of repair and remediation
Highlighted by regulator of social housing, as acceleration plan continues.
Free topic guide on mould in buildings
The new TG 26/2024 published by BSRIA.
Greater control for LAs over private rental selective licensing
A brief explanation of changes with the NRLA response.
Practice costs for architectural technologists
Salary standards and working out what you’re worth.
The Health and Safety Executive at 50
And over 200 years of Operational Safety and Health.
Thermal imaging surveys a brief intro
Thermal Imaging of Buildings; a pocket guide BG 72/2017.
Comments
[edit] To make a comment about this article, click 'Add a comment' above. Separate your comments from any existing comments by inserting a horizontal line.