Design Build Operate Transfer DBOT
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
There are many different routes by which the design and construction of a building can be procured. The selected route should follow a strategy which fits the long-term objectives of the client's business plan.
Design build operate transfer (DBOT), is generally a form of Public Private Partnership project (PPP) in which a single (private) contractor is appointed to design, build and operate a project on behalf of a (public) client before transferring operations and maintenance back to the client after an agreed period of time.
[edit] Public Private Partnerships
The term 'Public Private Partnerships' (PPP) refers to a very broad range of partnerships in which the public and private sectors collaborate. PPPs were first developed in the UK in the 1990s based on the belief that private sector companies might be more efficient at providing certain services than public authorities and so could deliver better value for money for taxpayers. Services included those associated with major infrastructure works such as roads, bridges, dams, railways, tunnels or maintenance and renewal of public facilities such as hospitals, schools, prisons, libraries, leisure centres and so on.
In the PPP model, the term ‘public’ refers to a project that is financed (or part financed) through a partnership between a private entity and a government. The project is then typically owned - and may be operated - by the private entity before ownership (and sometimes maintenance and operations) is then passed to the central or local government client.
[edit] Operations and transfer
Once the construction is complete, the contractor is granted the right to own, maintain and operate the project for a period of time. When this responsibility is transferred back to the public entity it is either done so freely or for a fee that is stipulated in the original contract.
This transfer typically occurs once the contractor has recovered its investment (or an agreed upon period of time has expired). It is common for the time period to be several decades in the case of large infrastructure projects that carry significant degrees of construction and operational risk.
In theory, this long term relationship encourages the contractor to develop a project with its overall performance in mind from the outset, rather than just considering the efficiency of its construction, as the contractor will be responsible for any high operating, maintenance or repairs bills. However, it ties both the client and the contractor into an very long-term arrangement that can be difficult to price. As a result, contractors may price considerable risk into their tenders, and so the client may not always achieve a best value outcome.
[edit] DBOT distinctions
DBOT is a variation on the build operate transfer (BOT) contract model, but in DBOT, the contractor designs as well as builds the project. This model can be attractive to some clients, as it designates a single point of responsibility for delivering the project and taking it through to operation.
DBOT differs from a design build finance and operate (DBFO) contract in which the contractor also finances the project and leases it to the client for an agreed period (perhaps 30 years) after which the development reverts to the client.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from constructuon and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
The increasing costs of repair and remediation
Highlighted by regulator of social housing, as acceleration plan continues.
Free topic guide on mould in buildings
The new TG 26/2024 published by BSRIA.
Greater control for LAs over private rental selective licensing
A brief explanation of changes with the NRLA response.
Practice costs for architectural technologists
Salary standards and working out what you’re worth.
The Health and Safety Executive at 50
And over 200 years of Operational Safety and Health.
Thermal imaging surveys a brief intro
Thermal Imaging of Buildings; a pocket guide BG 72/2017.