Vulnerable residents at risk from under-qualified workforce
![]() |
In August 2019, the Electrical Contractors’ Association responded to the government consultation following the Hackitt Report on fire safety in buildings. |
The safety of hospital patients, those in care and residents of high-rise buildings could still be at risk if those who work in higher-risk premises lack the necessary experience-based qualifications and competency – according to the Electrical Contractors Association (ECA).
In its response to the government’s ‘Building A Safer Future’ consultation, leading trade body ECA broadly agreed with the proposal for an ‘overarching competence framework’ for those who work on and in higher-risk buildings.
However, ECA also said the new framework must reinforce and extend experienced-based qualifications. Without doing so, ECA argues that electrical and other installations in higher risk residential buildings could pose an unacceptable risk of electrocution and fire.
In its response, ECA underlined that for a competence-based qualification system to ensure safety and quality in higher risk premises, all workers should undertake a suitable apprenticeship as a minimum. Alternative, comparable qualification routes should also be provided for existing experienced workers.
[edit] ECA Technical Director Mike Smith commented:
“ECA fully supports moves to ensure that those who work in higher-risk premises are suitably competent to do so, notably in the electrical and wider engineering services workforce.
“However, regulated competence-based qualifications, including apprenticeships, are fundamental to ensuring that installation and maintenance work delivers fire and electrical safety. Without this essential foundation, the residents of high-rise buildings and hospitals will remain at risk.”
ECA has also warned against the reliance, notably in the domestic consumer market, on short, classroom-based, courses which are being marketed as offering a fast track into competence.
Mike Smith added: “These short courses seriously undermine the take up of apprenticeships in the industry. Furthermore, their continued existence undermines calls from Dame Judith Hackitt and the government to ensure that the public is properly protected from fire risks in high rise buildings.”
[edit] About this article
This article was written by Omar Khalil, Communications Manager, ECA. It was published in August 2019 on the website of the Electrical Contractors’ Association (ECA) and can be accessed here.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles about electricity.
- Consumer electronics.
- Consumer unit.
- ECA articles.
- Electrical appliance.
- Electrical consumption.
- Electrical energy.
- Electrical equipment.
- Electrical installation.
- Electrical power.
- Electrical safety.
- Electrical system.
- Electrical wiring.
- Electrician.
- Electricity bill.
--ECA
Featured articles and news
Listed despite problems with its design.
Zen and the art of cycling exploration.
Design Council Homes Taskforce launched
To support government 1.5 million homes target within UK climate commitments.
The story of this knowledge quarter building.
In ecology, in hydrology, in biology and in architecture.
Creating environments that promote physical, mental, and social well-being.
UK cases of neutral current diversion
Research project looks for example contributions.
Overstocking and macro-economics cause a decline.
The 2024 update of the Common Assessment Standard
Demonstrating organisational capability’ to fulfil roles under the Building Safety Act.
56 recommendations for a better built environment
Published by the CIC ahead of the King’s Speech.
SkillELECTRIC Top 8 Competitors Named
in annual search for the UK’s best student electrician.
CIOB Diversity and Inclusion technical information sheet
Step-by-step guide on implementing D and I practices.
Conservation and the Indian City. Book review.
Reversibility in conservation ethics
Learning from painting conservation.
Where It's AT Podcast launched!
New CIAT Architectural Technology Podcast goes live.
Comments
110 volts instead of 240 volts would be a good start. As depicted by the photograph.