Front-loaded costs
The term ‘front-loaded’ refers to costs that are applied disproportionately to elements of the work that take place early on during a project or part of a project.
Suppliers may front-load costs (or prices in bids) in order to maximise their revenue early in a project by assigning overstated values to the preliminary elements of the work. For example, a contractor might front-load costs for preliminary construction work such as services diversions, demolition, setting out, groundworks, piling, and so on.
Front-loading costs can help reduce a supplier's risk on a project, by improving their cash flow and ensuring that maximum payments are received on projects that might not proceed to completion. However, making payments in excess of the value of work completed puts the client under greater financial pressure early in the project and also at greater risk if the project does not proceed, or if a supplier becomes insolvent or has to be replaced. It can also act as a disincentive for suppliers to keep to time schedules, as they may have already completed the most profitable parts of the works.
Front loading can be avoided by detailed cost planning and cash flow projection during the design development and tender stages of a project, giving the client a clear idea of how much they should be expected to pay at different stages. Tender assessment should then allow comparisons to be made between competing bids to determine whether individual tenderers have submitted excessive prices for certain aspects or stages of the works. During the construction phase, there should be careful assessment of applications for payment to ensure that the amounts paid do not exceed the value of the works completed.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.