Environmental performance of the water and sewerage companies
On 10 July 2019 the Environment Agency (EA) published Environmental performance of the water and sewerage companies, a report suggesting that water companies efforts to protect the environment were ‘simply unacceptable’ with only 1 of them performing at the level expected.
The annual report rates each of the 9 water and sewerage companies in England as green, amber or red on a range of measures including pollution, supply resilience, and complying with permits.
The report reveals that water company performance has deteriorated, reversing the gradual improvement that had been seen in since the rating system began in 2011. Serious pollution incidents have also increased in 2018, causing damage to rivers and wildlife.
Northumbrian Water was the only company to achieve the highest 4 star rating. The EA said this improvement should be applauded and had only been possible with focus from the top of the organisation and ongoing effort from operational teams.
Other findings included:
- Severn Trent Water, United Utilities and Wessex Water dropped from 4 stars to 3 stars.
- Anglian Water and Thames Water remained on 3 stars.
- Southern Water, South West Water and Yorkshire Water were only given 2 stars, described as an ‘unacceptable level of performance.’
- South West Water has consistently demonstrated unacceptable performance and a red rating for pollution incidents.
- Southern Water and Thames Water failed to demonstrate they have robust enough plans to maintain secure water supplies.
- Most water companies look set to fail to meet 2020 pollution targets.
Environment Agency Chair Emma Howard Boyd, said they will continue to work with Ofwat to look at financial penalties to drive better environmental performance and that companies should be reflecting on their environmental performance and long-term resilience - if this is poor they should be asking themselves whether dividends are justifiable.
Executive Director of Operations Dr Toby Willison said: “Water companies need to clean up their act. People expect water companies to improve the environment, not pollute rivers and ensure secure supplies of water. With only one exception, none of the companies are performing at the level we wish to see, the country expects and the environment needs. We will continue to challenge CEOs to improve company performance and we will take strong and appropriate enforcement action. Companies performing well have a positive ripple effect on the natural environment and communities in their regions. We want all water companies to meet the expectation of their customers, the needs of environment and learn from the best practice that the leading company is demonstrating.”
The full report is available at: Environmental performance of the water and sewerage companies.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- 2019 Price review draft determinations for water companies.
- Environment Agency.
- Flood and Water Management Act
- Groundwater control in urban areas.
- Mains water.
- Sustainable water.
- Urban water systems management: A data analytics approach EP 105.
- Water Act 2014.
- Water conservation
- Water consumption
- Water framework directive.
- Water Industry Act 1991.
- Water investment.
- Water quality.
- Water.
Featured articles and news
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from constructuon and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
The increasing costs of repair and remediation
Highlighted by regulator of social housing, as acceleration plan continues.
Free topic guide on mould in buildings
The new TG 26/2024 published by BSRIA.
Greater control for LAs over private rental selective licensing
A brief explanation of changes with the NRLA response.
Practice costs for architectural technologists
Salary standards and working out what you’re worth.
The Health and Safety Executive at 50
And over 200 years of Operational Safety and Health.
Thermal imaging surveys a brief intro
Thermal Imaging of Buildings; a pocket guide BG 72/2017.