Decision making process for construction projects
Typically, the client will be the ultimate decision maker on construction projects, as they will generally have instigated and will be paying for the project and are likely to have a long-term interest in it after the design and construction process has been completed.
However, the client is rarely a single person, even on relatively small projects and the client organisation is likely include a number of groups or individuals with an interest in, responsibility for or control over the project.
Depending on the complexity and size of the project, and whether the client is in the public or private sector, the levels of decision makers within the client organisation might be structured as follows:
- Main board of directors / Investment decision maker
- Project director / Senior responsible owner
- Board representative / Project sponsor
- Project board.
- User panels.
- Champions.
- Project managers
For more information see: Client.
However, there may be other parties with an interest in the project that may be involved in the decision-making process. This might include:
- Funders and shareholders.
- Insurers.
- The local authority.
- Other statutory authorities and non-statutory consultees.
- The emergency services.
- User groups.
For more information see: Stakeholders and Third-party dependencies.
These parties may not all have the same objectives or views and so it is important that a clear management strategy is in place to ensure that the right information is available at the right time to ensure the right people are able to make the right decisions. Building information modelling is seen as one of the tools that can help ensure this happens. For more information see: Building information modelling.
Typically the decision making process itself will involve passing through a number of key decision points, or gateways, at which the client assesses the state of development of the project and considers; whether it satisfies their strategic objectives, that it is affordable, that value is being delivered, and that risks are acceptable. They can then decide whether to progress to the next stage.
Allowing the client to make decision about whether to proceed at gateways requires the preparation and submission of relevant information by the consultant team, contractors and other suppliers. Decisions may also involve expert assessment and advice from client representatives, independent client advisers, project managers, or even external bodies (such as external design reviews).
It is possible that the client will decide not to proceed, or will ask for further work to be carried out, whether this is revision of the design, or undertaking value management exercises to re-align proposals with the available budget.
Decisions to proceed may be accompanied by the introduction of change control procedures, freezing certain aspects of the project. This ensures that approved parts of the project are not changed without the express permission of the client.
For more information see: Gateways and change control.
An detailed description off the process for securing information and making decision for a number of different procurement routes is available at: Project plans.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
Featured articles and news
Licensing construction; looking back to look forward
Voluntary to required contractors (licensing) schemes.
A contractor discusses the Building Safety Act
A brief to the point look at changes that have occurred.
CIOB Construction Manager of the Year award
Shortlist set to go head-to-head for prestigious industry title.
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.