What to expect of sustainability professionals
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Do infrastructure professionals expect too much, or the wrong thing, from their sustainability colleagues?
Civil engineering and infrastructure are central to sustainability and vice versa. Without infrastructure to meet society’s development, there won’t be any sustainability, whether we’re talking about social, economic or environmental sustainability.
But the infrastructure sector often expects too much, or the wrong thing, from their sustainability colleagues.
Infrastructure professionals all seem to expect that their sustainability colleagues will provide ‘the’ answer to the sustainability issues for each and every project.
In addition, sustainability professionals often act in a way that supports this expectation. This misunderstanding of sustainability is not delivering the innovative solutions we need.
[edit] Great and usually unrealistic expectations
It starts at conferences with sustainability professionals giving presentations that show how they can provide all the answers for everything.
“Here’s our wonderful project in which we started with problems X, Y, and Z, and the sustainability team/professional proposed solutions M, N, and O which all worked perfectly.” Hidden message: sustainability is a great way to solve lots of infrastructure or engineering challenges. This sounds great, doesn’t it?
Unfortunately, no. The unintended consequence of this message is the expectation that ‘the’ (single, best fit) sustainability solution already exists and that it can easily be found just by asking the project’s sustainability professional or sustainability team.
Take a recent example of a major infrastructure project costing a few billion pounds at which ‘the’ sustainability ‘solution’ for the whole project was expected to be explained in a single afternoon workshop to a senior team. How can the sustainability issues possibly be sorted out for such a project in a single workshop and to the senior team only?
This is a significant misunderstanding of sustainability because sustainability requires an almost bespoke response by an individual or a team. The approach to sustainability may be the same across different projects but the solutions are not. If we are to pursue infrastructure excellence then sustainability cannot be delivered in an afternoon workshop.
It requires an ongoing strategic engagement with many different stakeholders and constant dialogue with the teams delivering the project. Presentations of ‘the’ answer by sustainability professionals have the unfortunate effect of compounding the misunderstanding of the collective response at all levels that is needed.
In addition, this single answer misunderstanding of sustainability prevents it from being a powerful force for innovation as well as social, environmental and economic goods. To innovate, sustainability must be allowed to function as a critical friend or mirror on projects.
[edit] What should we expect from sustainability professionals?
On projects, sustainability professionals can provide the right questions and share best practice. Each professional is not an expert in water engineering, geotechnics, structures, planning, contracting, to name just a few disciplines.
Other professionals know their domain far better than sustainability professionals. But by providing the spaces and moments for the experts already working on the project they can facilitate the identification and working through of engineering questions. This different lens enables all the professionals on the project to develop solutions to the sustainability questions.
If we can live and work with the numerous sustainability questions for each project and give up on expecting others to provide the answer we will be able to start providing the sustainability solutions society requires.
This article was originally published here on 14th Nov 2017 by ICE. It was written by Davide Stronati, Chair ICE Sustainability Leadership Team and Global Sustainability Leader, MottMacDonald.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Commissioning Responsibilities Framework BG 88/2025
BSRIA guidance on establishing clear roles and responsibilities for commissioning tasks.
An architectural movement to love or hate.
Don’t take British stone for granted
It won’t survive on supplying the heritage sector alone.
The remarkable story of a Highland architect.
The Constructing Excellence Value Toolkit
Driving value-based decision making in construction.
Meet CIOB event in Northern Ireland
Inspiring the next generation of construction talent.
Reasons for using MVHR systems
6 reasons for a whole-house approach to ventilation.
Supplementary Planning Documents, a reminder
As used by the City of London to introduce a Retrofit first policy.
The what, how, why and when of deposit return schemes
Circular economy steps for plastic bottles and cans in England and Northern Ireland draws.
Join forces and share Building Safety knowledge in 2025
Why and how to contribute to the Building Safety Wiki.
Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regs
Approved amendment coming into effect 1 March 2025.
A new CIOB TIS on discharging CDM 2015 duties
Practical steps that can be undertaken in the Management of Contractors to discharge the relevant CDM 2015 duties.
Planning for homes by transport hubs
Next steps for infrastructure following the updated NPPF.
Access, history and Ty unnos.
The world’s first publicly funded civic park.
Exploring permitted development rights for change of use
Discussing lesser known classes M, N, P, PA and L.
CIOB Art of Building photo contest 2024 winners
Fresco School by Roman Robroek and Once Upon a Pass by Liam Man.