Leaseback
The term 'leaseback' (also known as sale-and-leaseback) refers to a financial arrangement in which the party selling an asset (usually property) leases it back from the purchaser. This is generally a long-term arrangement, allowing them to use the asset but no longer owning it. The seller of the asset becomes the lessee, and the purchaser becomes the lessor.
Companies often raise capital by taking up debt and giving up equity, in order to grow the business. Leaseback is neither debt nor equity; the company doesn’t increase its debt load but gains access to capital through the sale of assets, while not having capital tied up in the asset. Tax benefits can sometimes be gained through the use of leasebacks.
The arrangement is rather like that of a pawnshop in that a company exchanges a valuable asset for a certain amount of money. The difference is that there is no expectation that the asset will be bought back by the company.
Builders and construction companies with high fixed assets are common users of leaseback arrangements. They can be useful when a company needs to use the capital invested in an asset for other investments, but where they still require the asset in order to operate. The advantage to the lessor is that they receive a guaranteed lease with stable payments for a specified period of time.
The company may have the option to repurchase the asset at the end of the term or at specified points within the term.
There can be complexities in terms of defining the extent to which the company still has risks and liabilities relating to the asset even though it has sold it to the lessor.
Other disadvantages include the fact that the original owner loses any further interest in the growth of the asset’s value. In the case of property, the rent is also likely to be revised upwards at regular intervals, so what may have appeared to be a cheap source of funding in the short term, can prove to be expensive over the long term.
To avoid this drawback, an off-balance sheet version of leasebacks can be used. A 50-50 joint-owned company is set up which borrows the bulk of the capital to buy the assets, granting the vendor a lease in the normal way. Via its half-ownership of the joint company, the original owner retains an interest in the performance of the properties in the future.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Construction loan.
- Discounted cash flow.
- Equity and loan capital.
- Funding options.
- Joint venture.
- Mezzanine finance.
- Partnering and joint ventures for construction.
- Private Finance Initiative
- Property development finance.
- Real Estate Investment Trusts.
- Remortgage.
- Special purpose vehicles.
- Speculative construction.
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.