Assessing health and wellbeing in buildings
In January 2018, BRE and the International WELL Building Institute pbc (IWBI™) released a new, improved briefing paper that outlines how projects may achieve both a certified BREEAM rating and WELL Certification post-occupation.
Following the 2016 announcement of an agreement between the two organisations to pursue alignments between WELL and BREEAM; the crosswalk document, Assessing Health and Wellbeing in Buildings, was first published in early-2017 to make it easier for those wishing to obtain both a certified BREEAM rating and a WELL Certified™ rating.
The document provides guidance on how the process for pursuing dual certification may be streamlined, and offers information for architects and designers to better understand the requirements and how the two standards relate. It also sets out the areas where WELL requirements are addressed by UK and/or EU regulations, and where these can be omitted from an assessment for buildings undergoing a WELL assessment in these territories.
Specific improvements and enhancements to the guidance document include instructions for projects that clarify how to use the crosswalk, minor amendments to the alignments and overlaps between the two standards, and a simplified labeling system. The new crosswalk also features useful notes and comments to clarify these alignments.
BREEAM and WELL are both evidence-based systems that have best practice, continual improvement and the interest of both the environment and people at their heart. Certification under both systems is pursued through the submission of project documentation and on-site post-occupancy performance testing.
The publication of the briefing paper comes at a time when corporations as well as the real estate industry are increasingly looking at how the built environment impacts human health as well as sustainability.
Alan Yates, BREEAM Technical Director, said: “The document will allow clients and design teams to use the same evidence in both schemes. When you need or want both certification schemes, this document will guide project teams on the most efficient way of going through the process. They won’t need to duplicate evidence or calculate things in different ways, as approximately 35 % of credits are equivalent or aligned in some way. This will ultimately reduce the burden of assessing both schemes.”
This article was originally published here on 1 Feb 2017 by BRE Buzz. It was written by Simon Guy.
--BRE Buzz
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Are we doing the right thing? Shaping well-being into the future of our urban communities.
- BRE Buzz articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- BREEAM.
- BREEAM Assessor.
- Building Back Better: Health.
- Building for wellbeing.
- Building up wellbeing in construction.
- Human comfort in buildings.
- Measuring the wellbeing benefits of interior materials.
- Performance in use.
- Phobias.
- The Flourish Model to enhance wellbeing.
- WELL and BREEAM align.
- WELL Building Standard.
- Wellbeing and buildings.
- Wellbeing considerations for property managers.
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.