5 Whys
[edit] Introduction
The ‘root cause’ is the true or underlying reason why something has happened - usually something that has gone wrong. Finding the root cause enables appropriate action to be taken to prevent a problem from happening again - for example, when a nonconformity report (NCR) is raised. Otherwise, action taken may be focussed on the effect rather than the true cause. Therefore, when undertaking investigations into an incident (whether quality or otherwise), specific attention is given to identifying the root cause.
The ‘5 Whys’ is a very simple but effective way to help determine the root cause of an issue by continually asking ‘why’ until the root cause is identified.
[edit] What is 5 Why’s?
It is not unusual for young children to ask ‘why’ when discussing something. Having been given an answer by the adult, the young child then asks ‘why’ again but this time in relation to the answer given, the adult answers and the child persists asking why again in relation to the next answer and so on. This can be very annoying! However, the child is actually demonstrating the principles of the ‘5 Whys’ very effectively. The child (perhaps unknowingly) is trying to find the basis of the reason for the adult’s decision.
The ‘5 whys’ quality tool is simply a way to delve deeper and deeper into the reasons for what has happened. Each time a question is asked and answered we can refer to this as a ‘level’. When no further answers can be given, theoretically, the ‘root cause’ has been determined.
It is often assumed that asking ‘why’ 5 times allows the root cause to be identified (although this may not always be the case).
Question | Answer | |
Level 1 | Why was the bolt not tightened to the correct torque? | The operative was not aware that the bolt had to be tightened to a specified torque. |
Level 2 | Why was the operative not aware that the bolt had to be tightened? | The operative did not receive information from the supervisor. |
Level 3 | Why did the supervisor not supply information to the operative? | The supervisor did not have the information available. |
Level 4 | Why did the supervisor not have the information available? | The supervisor could not access the network drive system. |
Level 5 (root cause) | Why could the supervisor not access the network drive system? | There was no power due to electrical testing. |
It is important to recognise that an issue may initially appear to be the result of one thing when actually the root cause is very different. It is the root cause that will enable the problem to be solved and prevent it from happening again.
A form to help use the 5 Whys quality tool can be downloaded here.
Original article written by Mike Buss, reviewed by Tony Hoyle on behalf of the CQI Construction Special Interest Group, and accepted for publication by the Competency Working Group on 7 March 2018.
--ConSIG CWG 13:32, 28 Feb 2019 (BST)
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Annex SL
- Change control: a quality perspective
- Compensation event.
- Delay to completion.
- Delay to progress.
- Digital quality management in construction.
- Dispute resolution.
- Disruption claims in construction.
- How to write an inspection and test plan.
- Inspection and test plan.
- International research into the causes of delays on construction projects.
- Lifts and escalators: a quality perspective.
- Mobilisation to site: a quality perspective.
- Relevant event.
- Relevant matter.
- Structural steelwork: a quality perspective.
- Why should quality be important to the construction industry?
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.