Trompe l'oeil (part 2)
Would you walk over this bridge? |
In architecture, trompe l’oeil (Brit. pronunciation tromp-loy) describes visual effects designed to intentionally create an optical illusion. The term comes from the French meaning ‘to deceive the eye’. The aim of such effects is to make things seem what they are not, for example, to make things appear bigger, longer, shorter, more expansive, and so on. The viewer may or may not be aware that what they are observing is a deception.
Such techniques can be used to satisfy aesthetic requirements or address a design’s limitations, (such as making a very small space appear less claustrophobic or, in interior decorating, painting a mural or applying wallpaper to give the viewer the impression of a window with a pleasant view. Sometimes architects and artists use trompe l’oeil to inject light-heartedness into an otherwise serious composition.
Artists throughout history have used trompe l’oeil. It was used to trick the observer into believing that what is depicted on a two-dimensional surface is actually three dimensional. Many cities have striking modern murals that achieve this effect, although the ‘reality’ may depend on where the viewer stands.
[edit] A few case studies
The entasis on the upper parts of the Doric columns (left) is just about discernible. |
Architects may use trompe l’oeil to correct a natural phenomenon. The ancient Greeks, for example, added entasis to the columns of the Parthenon and other temples to correct the natural ‘appearance’ (to the naked eye) of columns buckling or bowing – which was considered an illusion of weakness. By splaying the columns almost imperceptibly inwards at their upper reaches (in other words decreasing the column diameter) the result is a column with convex sides, that gives, paradoxically, an illusion of straightness and so of ‘solidity’ and ‘strength’.
Later, in the Baroque period, the 17th century architect and sculptor Gian Lorenzo Bernini who designed the colonnades on either side of St Peter’s Square, Rome, created a design of immense proportions (1656-1667). To give the visitor the effect of an embrace in the “maternal arms of the Mother Church”, the colonnades on either side of the square are splayed outwards in the direction of the basilica. On approaching the basilica, the visitor does not perceive the usual natural perspective of lines converging to a vanishing point. Instead, the diverging colonnades look to be parallel, an optical illusion that makes the basilica appear closer to the viewer than it actually is. Leaving the basilica, the effect is reversed as the exaggerated perspective of the converging colonnades results in significant foreshortening.
Another optical effect of note is that when standing in the middle of the square, the observer perceives the colonnades on either side (284 columns in total) to be just one column deep; in reality, they are four-columns deep.
In 17th and 18th century Britain, one of the applications of trompe l’oeil was for reasons of aesthetics, economy and practicality: the use of polished plaster on walls and columns gave a highly-realistic impression of marble or travertine, creating an illusion of depth and texture, without requiring the stonemason’s craft – and at a fraction of the cost. Polished plaster was first used by the ancient Egyptians and extensively in Venetian palaces of the Renaissance and Baroque periods. It is still in use today throughout the world.
See also: Trompe l’oeil part 1
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Harnessing robotics and AI in challenging environments
The key to nuclear decommissioning and fusion engineering.
BSRIA announces Lisa Ashworth as new CEO
Tasked with furthering BSRIA’s impressive growth ambitions.
Public buildings get half a billion energy efficiency boost
£557 million to switch to cleaner heating and save on energy.
CIOB launches pre-election manifesto
Outlining potential future policies for the next government.
Grenfell Tower Inquiry announcement
Phase 2 hearings come to a close and the final report due in September.
Progress from Parts L, F and O: A whitepaper, one year on.
A replicated study to understand the opinion of practitioners.
A distinct type of countryside that should be celebrated.
Should Part O be extended to existing buildings?
EAC brands heatwave adaptation a missed opportunity.
Definition of Statutory in workplace and facilities management
Established by IWFM, BESA, CIBSE and BSRIA.
Tackling the transition from traditional heating systems
59% lack the necessary information and confidence to switch.
The general election and the construction industry
As PM, Rishi Sunak announces July 4 date for an election.
Home improvements swapped for green energy upgrades
As applications down since and desire to reduce bills up.
Eco apprenticeships continue help grow green workforce
A year after being recognised at the King's coronation.
The Use of Natural Insulation Materials in Retrofit
New paper from STBA with support from SDF.
National Retrofit Hub in partnership with InstallerSHOW.
Permitted development rights for agricultural buildings
The changes coming into effect as of May 21, 2024.
Biodiversity and the built environment digital series
The nature of building, with CIOB and CWP.
A call for prevention and sensitive re-use.
Risks to the long-term effectiveness of the BNG scheme
National Audit Office publish review of Biodiversity Net Gain.
The CIAT principal designer register
Providing assurance and verification of the capability and competence of registered ATs.
Scottish Government action to reach net-zero targets
Retrofit expert group highlight critical actions needed.